Sign In

Why Subscribe?

Get in on this. It’s like grad school in sneakers — no tuition, no thinkfluencers, just real talk with receipts.

Success! Now Check Your Email

To complete Subscribe, click the confirmation link in your inbox. If it doesn’t arrive within 3 minutes, check your spam folder.

Ok, Thanks
Sign In
The Fox Advantage: How Fox News Gets Special Treatment—And What Can Be Done 3 min read
The Fox Advantage: How Fox News Gets Special Treatment—And What Can Be Done Post image
Power
Power

The Fox Advantage: How Fox News Gets Special Treatment—And What Can Be Done

Fox News has long been at the center of American political discourse. But behind the headlines lies another story—how the network secures special financial treatment compared to other news outlets.

By Stephanie Vargas
Featured post

Fox News has long been at the center of American political discourse. But behind the headlines lies another story—how the network secures special financial treatment compared to other news outlets. Through higher carriage fees, bundled cable tiers, and aggressive negotiation tactics, Fox News extracts billions annually from subscribers, many of whom never watch it. This piece examines how the system works, why it persists, and what solutions can rebalance the playing field.

1. Carriage Fees: The Hidden “Fox Tax”

Fox News charges cable and satellite providers about $2 per household per month, regardless of whether subscribers watch the channel. By comparison, CNN receives around $1.06, and MSNBC just $0.36. Only ESPN commands more per-subscriber revenue.
(Source: The Guardian)

This means Fox News receives an estimated $1.8 billion annually in guaranteed income from cable fees alone—making it one of the most profitable arms of Fox Corporation. Even as advertisers retreat from controversial shows, carriage fees insulate the network from financial fallout.
(Source: LA Times)

2. Viewership Power Fuels Negotiation Leverage

Fox News dominates cable ratings, averaging 2.5–2.8 million primetime viewers in 2025—more than CNN and MSNBC combined. This viewership edge strengthens Fox’s hand in negotiations with distributors. If cable companies refuse Fox’s terms, they risk losing one of their most-watched (and therefore most profitable) channels.
(Sources: Fox News May Ratings, Fox News Q2 Ratings)

3. Bundling: Why Consumers Can’t Opt Out

Most cable bundles make Fox News unavoidable. Subscribers who don’t want the channel must either pay for it anyway or drop entire packages. As one cable customer vented: “I am SICK of paying for Fox News as a part of my cable package!”
(Source: Reddit Comcast Forum)

This bundling ensures that Fox profits not only from its loyal audience but also from millions of Americans who never watch it.

Solutions: Breaking the Cycle

A. Transparency & Regulation

  • Require public disclosure of carriage fees so consumers and policymakers can see how costs are distributed.
  • Cap annual increases, tying them to inflation or measurable audience demand.

B. Consumer Choice (A La Carte Options)

  • Mandate a la carte or “build-your-own” bundles, giving subscribers the power to drop Fox News without losing other channels.
  • Encourage “news-lite” tiers for households uninterested in 24/7 cable news.

C. Support Competitive Alternatives

  • Incentivize investment in independent, non-profit, and local journalism, which can be offered at lower costs.
  • Expand streaming packages that bypass traditional cable gatekeepers.

D. Consumer & Advocacy Pressure

  • Campaigns like #NoFoxFee, backed by groups like Common Cause, already pressure distributors to resist fee hikes. In 2023, over 165,000 signatures were delivered to Comcast demanding accountability.
    (Source: Common Cause)
  • Lawsuits, such as Fox’s $787.5 million Dominion settlement, highlight reputational and financial risks. Distributors could cite these to negotiate fee reductions or demand stricter content accountability.
    (Source: Wikipedia – Fox News controversies)

Conclusion

Fox News’s special treatment comes not only from its audience dominance but also from a financial system stacked in its favor. By demanding outsized carriage fees and locking itself into cable bundles, Fox has created a revenue machine that thrives even amid advertiser boycotts and scandals.

Breaking this cycle will require regulatory oversight, consumer empowerment, and competitive innovation. The choice is clear: either continue subsidizing Fox News involuntarily—or build a more transparent, accountable, and consumer-driven media economy.

References

By
Stephanie Vargas
Power
Featured post

Comments

Read Next